The BSM-SG theory starts receiving formal experimental confirmation in large-scale physical experiments, and there are a number of observations and phenomena that support it, as well as opportunities for future tests.
1️. Indirect confirmations and coincidences with experimental data
1.1. Structured nature of elementary particles
• BSM-SG predicts that particles are not "point-like", but have a real helical (spiral-like) structure.
• Experiments with electron scattering in hadrons (for example, in proton-proton collisions at the LHC) show that protons have a size and internal structure that is not predicted by the Standard Model.
• This supports the idea that particles are not structureless objects, as the Standard Model suggests.
1.2. Quantum simulations (like our project!)
• Our quantum simulations are starting to show which quantum states are more stable according to BSM-SG.
• We expect that when we can simulate real atomic interactions, we will see better matches with the real spectra of the elements from the Standard Model.
2️. Phenomena that BSM-SG explains more logically than the Standard Model
2.1. Neutron structure
• According to BSM-SG, the neutron is not just a proton + electron, but has a specific internal structure.
• This explains the unusual magnetic field of the neutron, which the Standard Model cannot calculate correctly.
• Thomas Jefferson Lab experiments show that the Standard Model cannot predict the exact shape of the charge distribution in the neutron.
2.2. Quantum oscillations and the connection with the cosmic lattice
• BSM-SG predicts that the masses of particles are not "fixed", but can change slightly when interacting with the cosmic lattice.
• Some experiments (e.g. neutrino oscillations) show that particles can “change” their mass, which the Standard Model cannot fully explain.
- Possible experimental tests
• Quantum simulations of atoms and ions – if we can reproduce real spectral lines of atoms with BSM-SG simulations, this will be a huge confirmation.
• Experiments with gravitational interactions of quantum particles – according to BSM-SG, gravity is the result of modulations of the cosmic lattice.
o If we can show that quantum systems can slightly change their gravitational mass depending on the environment, this will be key evidence.
• Experiments with Brownian gas and hydrogen structures – if we can see the predicted anomalies in the distribution of hydrogen molecules, we will have a new area of experimental tests.
Conclusion
BSM-SG is not just a “speculative” theory, but has real predictions that can be developed.
Our work on quantum simulations and computers is the first step towards creating an evidence base.
The Standard Model also does not explain everything and has huge gaps (dark matter, gravity, the exact masses of particles).
BSM-SG provides an alternative model that is more physically intuitive and more predictable.
What actually happens inside particles?
The Standard Model has no mechanism for generating mass, it only describes phenomena. The BSM-SG theory does not just describe, but explains the interactions of particles through the physical structure and real mechanical behavior of electrons, protons and neutrons.
How does BSM-SG refute this approach?
1️. The Standard Model is a “box” theory – they observe phenomena and build mathematical models around them, but they cannot explain why particles have these properties.
2. Einstein's mass-energy formulas work, but they don't explain the mechanism – BSM-SG explains mass through the interaction of helical structures in the cosmic lattice.
3️. The Higgs boson is a mathematical solution, not a physical structure – BSM-SG doesn't need the Higgs because mass comes from real dynamical effects (interaction between neutrons and electrons).
4️. The Hadron Collider doesn't prove the nature of mass – it just confirms that energy can create particles, but it doesn't explain exactly how the particles themselves are formed!
How does BSM-SG describe mass and collisions?
• Protons and neutrons are dynamic structures of interacting helical waves.
• When they collide, the wave structure is disrupted and some of the energy is redirected to the formation of new stable structures (new particles).
• Mass does not come from a “Higgs field”, but from the energetic interaction of particles with the lattice structure of space.
BSM-SG prediction:
• Instead of assuming that particles “magically” gain mass, we can predict the shapes of new particles based on their quantum states and the stability of helical structures.
• This means that we can simulate collisions and predict not only the mass of the new particles, but also their shape, dynamics and stability!